Panel description: JJ Abrams' Kelvin Timeline (Star Trek 2009, Into Darkness, Beyond) divided the fandom. Many Trekkies felt it sacrificed Star Trek's core identity for flashy action. Others enjoyed the fresh take and character re-imaginings. In this respectful and engaging debate, we'll explore what worked, what didn't, and whether the Kelvin Timeline deserves more love - or if it should be left in a black hole.
NOTE: this is raw video and unfortunately, the mics did not pick up the questions/comments from the audience, but I felt like this discussion was too fun not to post.
Panelists:
Nick Frutiger
Anthony Liggins
